Okay, rant over.
Now lets get to the real point.
As much as we like to rely on designers to give us what we need and want, sometimes they fail. Sometimes, as here, they utterly mis-read both their potential clients, and the times. This happens, primarily because things shift about so fast in the mass unconscious that its hard to be accurate with regard to what people are going to need in 6 months.
Now as we keep chugging along in the 21st century, and the borders between cultures, and sexualities blur even more than they have already, keeping up with what is going on inside the collective brain pan is going to bet harder; lots harder. So instead of trying to predict what millions of people will want, it makes more sense to keep the focus on smaller groups, who are easier to understand, and provide for.
It may just be the first glimmerings of a turning point for Attire, away from mass marketed goods, to apparel that is more gauged towards place, need, and local society. I am reminded of the whoops moment that occurred when Bloomingdales decided to open in San Francisco. They didn't bother one little bit to take the meter of the people here. They simply brought what they sold in New York to the West coast. It didn't work very well. There was a pretty furious backing and filling action that happened, as lines disappeared and others replaced them. Its not that San Franciscans are less stylish, or less aware of trend, but rather that the baseline style is different from that of New York.
For example, it doesn't snow here, ever. And the temperatures never drop below freezing. So clothing suitable for deep winter is really not going to move. And summers here rarely get above 75 degrees, so gauzy, floaty skirts are going to stay on the racks.
Ultimately, its about paying attention. Those of us wearing the clothes need to pay attention to what we are communicating, and what we are seeing communicated. And the industry must know how to supply the words we want to use, to do just that.